Examining how meta-analytic methods perform
| Author | Doi, Suhail A.R. |
| Available date | 2023-02-22T05:15:02Z |
| Publication Date | 2022-05-01 |
| Publication Name | Research Synthesis Methods |
| Identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1548 |
| Citation | Doi, S.A.R. (2022), Examining how meta-analytic methods perform. Res Syn Meth, 13: 292-293. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1548 |
| ISSN | 1759-2879 |
| Abstract | I read with interest the paper by Bramley et al.1 that concluded (regarding error estimation) that the IVhet method often outperforms the Henmi-copas (HC) method with fewer than 10 studies. They also concluded that the IVhet method is never the best choice of interval because for small numbers of studies Knapp–Hartung (KH) method is better and for larger numbers HC is better. |
| Language | en |
| Publisher | Wiley |
| Subject | meta-analysis methods simulation |
| Type | Other |
| Pagination | 292-293 |
| Issue Number | 3 |
| Volume Number | 13 |
| ESSN | 1759-2887 |
Files in this item
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
|
There are no files associated with this item. |
|||
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Medicine Research [1314 items ]