Show simple item record

AuthorThomas, Binny
AuthorPaudyal, Vibhu
AuthorMacLure, Katie
AuthorPallivalapila, Abdulrouf
AuthorMcLay, James
AuthorEl Kassem, Wessam
AuthorAl Hail, Moza
AuthorStewart, Derek
Available date2019-08-21T05:36:32Z
Publication Date2019
Publication NameEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacologyen_US
Identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-019-02689-y
CitationThomas, B., Paudyal, V., MacLure, K. et al. Eur J Clin Pharmacol (2019) 75: 1269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-019-02689-y
ISSN0031-6970
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10576/11700
Abstract© 2019, The Author(s). Purpose: The aim was to critically appraise, synthesise and present the evidence of medication errors amongst hospitalised patients in Middle Eastern countries, specifically prevalence, nature, severity and contributory factors. Methods: CINAHL, Embase, Medline, Pubmed and Science Direct were searched for studies published in English from 2000 to March 2018, with no exclusions. Study selection, quality assessment (using adapted STROBE checklists) and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers. A narrative approach to data synthesis was adopted; data related to error causation were synthesised according to Reason’s Accident Causation model. Results: Searching yielded 452 articles, which were reduced to 50 following removal of duplicates and screening of titles, abstracts and full-papers. Studies were largely from Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Jordan. Thirty-two studies quantified errors; definitions of ‘medication error’ were inconsistent as were approaches to data collection, severity assessment, outcome measures and analysis. Of 13 studies reporting medication errors per ‘total number of medication orders’/ ‘number of prescriptions’, the median across all studies was 10% (IQR 2–35). Twenty-four studies reported contributory factors leading to errors. Synthesis according to Reason’s model identified the most common being active failures, largely slips (10 studies); lapses (9) and mistakes (12); error-provoking conditions, particularly lack of knowledge (13) and insufficient staffing levels (13) and latent conditions, commonly heavy workload (9). Conclusion: There is a need to improve the quality and reporting of studies from Middle Eastern countries. A standardised approach to quantifying medication errors’ prevalence, severity, outcomes and contributory factors is warranted.
Languageen
PublisherSpringer
SubjectMiddle East
SubjectPrescribing errors
SubjectSystematic review
TitleMedication errors in hospitals in the Middle East: a systematic review of prevalence, nature, severity and contributory factors
TypeArticle
Pagination1269–1282
Issue Number9
Volume Number75
elsevier.identifier.scopusid SCOPUS_ID:85066328860
dc.identifier.essn 1432-1041


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record