Show simple item record

AuthorSaif, Badran
AuthorDoi, Suhail A.
AuthorIskeirjeh, Sara
AuthorAljassem, Ghanem
AuthorJafarian, Nasrin
AuthorClark, Justin
AuthorHabib, Abdella M.
AuthorGlass, Graeme E.
Available date2023-02-21T10:12:29Z
Publication Date2023-02-28
Publication NameJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2022.10.054
CitationBadran S, Doi SA, Iskeirjeh S, Aljassem G, Jafarian N, Clark J, Habib AM, Glass GE. Metabolic changes after nonsurgical fat removal: A dose response meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023 Feb;77:68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.10.054.
ISSN17486815
URIhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681522006167
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10576/40256
AbstractBackgroundObesity-induced insulin resistance leads to the metabolic syndrome. Both bariatric surgery and surgical fat removal have been shown to improve metabolic health, but the metabolic benefits of nonsurgical fat removal remain uncertain. The aim of this paper is to establish whether nonsurgical fat removal exerts measurable, lasting metabolic benefits by way of changes to serum lipid profiles. MethodsPubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, and clinical trials registers were searched using the Polyglot Search Translator to find studies examining quantitative changes in metabolic markers after nonsurgical body contouring procedures. The MethodologicAl STandard for Epidemiological Research (MASTER) scale was adopted for the quality assessment of the included studies. The robust-error meta-regression (REMR) model was employed. ResultsTwenty-two studies and 676 participants were included. Peak body compositions measures manifest as a reduction of 2 units in body mass index (BMI), 1 kg of body weight (BW), 5 cm in waist circumference (WC) and 1.5 cm in abdominal fat thickness (FT), sustained up to 60 days postprocedure. Transient increases of 15 mg/dL in low-density lipoprotein (LDL), 10 mg/dl in triglycerides (TG), and 15 mg/dl in total cholesterol (TC) were observed at 2 weeks postprocedure. ConclusionWhile nonsurgical fat removal exerts sustained effects on body anthropometrics, changes to serum lipid profiles were transient. There is no compelling evidence at present to support the conclusion that nonsurgical fat removal is metabolically beneficial.
SponsorThis project was supported by the Medical Research Office at Hamad Medical Corporation (Project ID: 01–20–466) and QNRF (Projects ID: NPRP14S-0406–210153 and NPRP13S-0203–200234). The responsibility for the paper lies with the authors and there was no influence of the funder. Authors have complete access to the study data that support this publication.
Languageen
PublisherElsevier
SubjectCryolipolysis
Laser lipolysis
Radiofrequency ablation
High intensity focused thermal ultrasound (HIFU)
BMI
Lipid profile
TitleMetabolic changes after nonsurgical fat removal: A dose response meta-analysis
TypeArticle Review
Pagination68-77
Volume Number77


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record